Jack Woollams
← Back to Demos

Synthetic interactive demo

Voice of the Client Workflow

Step through a public-safe workflow for designing a client contact review, aligning analyst assessment, integrating manual and system-level data, and turning contact friction into improvement priorities.

Synthetic data notice: This demo uses synthetic public-safe examples only. It is not connected to NDIA, CBA, ART, client systems, government records, or any internal operational data.

Selected stage

Purpose and scope

Define why the review is being run, which contact journeys are in scope, and what decisions the output should support.

Key decisions

  • Review period and channels
  • Decision owners
  • Improvement questions
  • Public-safe reporting boundaries

Controls

  • Documented scope statement
  • Explicit exclusions
  • Stakeholder sign-off

Outputs

  • Review brief
  • Scope map
  • Decision question list

Common risks

  • Review tries to answer too many questions
  • Unclear improvement owner
  • Outputs become descriptive rather than decision-ready

What good looks like

Every assessment category maps to a decision, owner, or service improvement question.

Sample design simulator

Representative review setup

Total sampled contacts 2200
Calls sampled 1100
Emails sampled 1100
Queue coverage 100%
Small queues protected Yes
Sampling risk Low

Recommended adjustment

Proceed with representative sampling and maintain documented queue coverage checks.

Analyst assessment framework

Manual review categories

Selected categories 8
Complexity score 16
Training need Medium
QA alignment risk Medium

Recommended calibration sample

80 synthetic contacts before full review.

QA alignment check

Analyst calibration

Analyst review alignment

Analyst Agreement rate Disputed classifications Categories needing calibration
Analyst A 82% 5 Sentiment
Analyst B 78% 7 Avoidable contact
Analyst C 76% 8 Friction point
Analyst D 79% 6 Sentiment
Agreement rate 78%
Alignment status Needs calibration
Calibration required Yes

Recommended action

Run calibration session before full review.

Insight and prioritisation

Synthetic friction themes

Theme Volume signal Impact Confidence Suggested owner type Recommended action Priority quadrant
Repeat contact due to unclear process 84 High High Process owner Clarify the process step and monitor repeat contact movement after intervention. High impact / high confidence
Avoidable contact from missing guidance 76 High High Guidance owner Update guidance material and add a post-change check on avoidable contact. High impact / high confidence
Escalation caused by ownership uncertainty 64 High Medium Service delivery owner Define ownership rules and escalation pathways for unresolved requests. High impact / lower confidence
Channel switching due to unresolved request 59 Medium High Channel owner Review channel guidance and close the loop on unresolved requests. Low impact / high confidence
Rework caused by incomplete case notes 38 Medium High Team leader Reinforce case note standards and audit a small follow-up sample. Low impact / high confidence
Knowledge article gap 44 Medium Medium Knowledge owner Create or refresh knowledge material for the recurring contact driver. Monitor only

High impact / high confidence

  • Repeat contact due to unclear process
  • Avoidable contact from missing guidance

High impact / lower confidence

  • Escalation caused by ownership uncertainty

Low impact / high confidence

  • Channel switching due to unresolved request
  • Rework caused by incomplete case notes

Monitor only

  • Knowledge article gap

Executive summary generator

Decision-ready summary

The synthetic review indicates that Repeat contact due to unclear process, Avoidable contact from missing guidance, Escalation caused by ownership uncertainty are the strongest improvement themes. Small queue protection reduced sampling bias, while the medium training need and analyst alignment checks show Sentiment and Avoidable contact and Friction point require calibration. Recommended next steps are to assign owners for the top three friction themes, update guidance or process controls where required, and monitor repeat contact movement after intervention.

What this demonstrates

Governed contact review delivery

Methodology design

Public-safe example of the control thinking needed to make a large contact review repeatable, explainable, and useful for leaders.

Analyst coordination

Public-safe example of the control thinking needed to make a large contact review repeatable, explainable, and useful for leaders.

QA and calibration

Public-safe example of the control thinking needed to make a large contact review repeatable, explainable, and useful for leaders.

Data integration

Public-safe example of the control thinking needed to make a large contact review repeatable, explainable, and useful for leaders.

Reporting assurance

Public-safe example of the control thinking needed to make a large contact review repeatable, explainable, and useful for leaders.

Executive decision support

Public-safe example of the control thinking needed to make a large contact review repeatable, explainable, and useful for leaders.

Service improvement prioritisation

Public-safe example of the control thinking needed to make a large contact review repeatable, explainable, and useful for leaders.

Governance handover

Public-safe example of the control thinking needed to make a large contact review repeatable, explainable, and useful for leaders.